Toolkit For Thinking
Search this site
Home Page
Creative Thinking
5 Whys
Brainstorming
Cause and Effect Diagrams
Concept Fan
Fractionation
Mind Mapping
Random Word Stimulation
Six Thinking Hats
Subconscious Thinking
SWOT Analysis
Critical Thinking
Anatomy of an Argument
Arguments and the Physical World
Dissection of an Argument
Treatment For An Argument
Physical World Tested Arguments
Logic and Logical Fallacies
Types of Logical Fallacy
Inductive Logic Arguments
Cherry picking
Proof by example
Argument from repetition
Circular cause and consequence
Continuum fallacy
Correlation does not imply causation
Division
Ecological fallacy
Fallacy of the single cause
Argument from ignorance
Argument from silence
Association fallacy
Broken window fallacy
Circular cause and consequence
False compromise
Gambler's fallacy
Historian's fallacy
Incomplete comparison
Inconsistent comparison
Intentional fallacy
Luddite fallacy
Overwhelming exception
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Prosecutor's fallacy
Regression fallacy
Psychologist's fallacy
Retrospective determinism
Spotlight fallacy
Texas sharpshooter fallacy
Two wrongs make a right
Wrong direction
Denial Arguments
Argument from personal incredulity
Nirvana fallacy
Burden of proof
Loki's Wager
Moving the goalpost
Perfect solution fallacy
Special pleading
Converse accident
Procrastination
Irrelevant Arguments
Ad hominem
Denying the correlative
Irrelevant conclusion
Appeal to ridicule
Equivocation
Leading question
False attribution
Contextomy
Accident
Ad nauseam
Appeal to authority
Appeal to consequences
Appeal to emotion
Appeal to fear
Appeal to flattery
Appeal to motive
Appeal to novelty
Appeal to poverty
Appeal to spite
Appeal to tradition
Appeal to wealth
Appeal to force
Appeal to the majority
Chronological snobbery
False analogy
Genetic fallacy
Hasty generalization
Misleading vividness
Pathetic fallacy
Poisoning the well
Proof by verbosity
Red herring
Sentimental fallacy
Sisyphean fallacy
Slippery slope
Straw man
Style over substance fallacy
Thought-terminating cliche
Tu quoque
Wishful thinking
Deductive Logic Arguments
Appeal to probability
Argument from fallacy
Bare assertion fallacy
Base rate fallacy
Conjunction fallacy
Fallacy of necessity
Suppressed correlative
False dilemma
If-by-whiskey
Affirmative conclusion from negative premise
Affirming a disjunct
Affirming the consequence
Appeal to nature
Begging the question
Definist fallacy
Denying the antecedent
Existential fallacy
Fallacy of exclusive premises
Fallacy of four terms
Fallacy of the undistributed middle
Homunculus fallacy
Illicit major
Masked man fallacy
Naturalistic fallacy
Negative proof fallacy
Package-deal fallacy
Reification
Creating Value
Cumulative Value
Cost Benefit Analysis
Decision Tree
Roles and Responsibility Analysis (RACI)
Children's Garden Activities and Learning
Grow It Activities
Make It Activities
Observation and Craft Activies
Garden Bird Watch
Games and Quizzes
Share It Activities
Miscellaneous
Abstract and Physical Worlds
Contact form
Defining the foundation
How does this help?
Mathematics and the Physical World
Problem Solving and the Physical World
Templates
Uncertainty and the Physical World
Useful Websites
When to be Paranoid
Sitemap
Critical Thinking
>
Anatomy of an Argument
>
Inductive Logic Arguments
>
Two wrongs make a right
Name of fallacy
Two wrongs make a right
Aliases
Type
Inductive Argument, Informal Argument
Description
The fallacy occurs when it is assumed that if one wrong is committed, another wrong will cancel it out
Example
Form
Treatment
Two errors in evidence don't cancel each other.
Comments